Temporary Assessment Form
Permanent Resident Assessment Form
School Assessment Form
Alberta AAIP – Worker Expression Of Interest (EOI) Calculator
As Canada gears up for its federal election on April 28, 2025, the political debate is intensifying around one of the nation’s most pressing policy areas: immigration. With a current population of 41,528,680 as of January 2025 and a modest quarterly growth of 0.2%, immigration fuels demographic expansion and underpins critical economic strategies across the country.
A Shifting Focus on Immigration Targets
The latest Immigration Levels Plan for 2025–2027, unveiled on October 24, 2024, marks a significant policy recalibration. In a notable departure from previous projections that aimed for 500,000 permanent residents in 2025, the government has now set a target of 395,000. Officials cite concerns over housing shortages, healthcare capacity, and the strain on public services as key reasons for this downscale. Alongside this, the plan introduces the country’s first controlled targets for temporary residents—such as international students and foreign workers—aiming to reduce their representation to 5% of Canada’s population by early 2027.
Further reflecting this cautious approach, recent data from Statistics Canada reveals that the population of temporary residents has seen a slight decline. As of January 1, 2025, there were 3,020,936 temporary residents (making up 7.3% of the total population) after a net loss of 28,341 individuals from October 2024—a trend that points to renewed efforts to manage migration flows better.
A Political Crossroads: Party Visions on Immigration
This election unfolds against a backdrop of diverse political visions on immigration:
- Liberal Party (Leader: Mark Carney): Historically a champion of high immigration levels, the current Liberal government under Carney now advocates for a measured approach. The proposed cap on permanent immigration reflects a commitment to aligning growth with the country’s housing and service capacities. Their strategy emphasizes economic benefits through family reunification and the gradual integration of temporary residents into permanent status.
- Conservative Party (Leader: Pierre Poilievre): Positioning itself as the party of controlled immigration, the Conservatives argue for even further reductions in overall levels. Poilievre’s platform calls for prioritizing economic migrants and tightening border security. His stance—summarized in a pointed remark that immigration numbers “will be much lower” under his leadership—seeks to defend Canada’s infrastructure from the pressures of rapid migration.
- New Democratic Party (NDP) (Leader: Jagmeet Singh): The NDP remains steadfast in supporting robust immigration to meet labor demands and uphold humanitarian values. Singh’s party is pushing for increased funding to streamline processing times, enhance settlement services, and ensure refugee protections, aiming to resolve persistent backlogs while supporting family reunification.
- Green Party (Leader: Elizabeth May): Advocating for sustainable immigration, the Green Party focuses on environmental considerations and aligning migration with climate goals. Their platform supports initiatives to create green jobs through immigration and underscores the importance of refugee protection alongside ambitious targets for increasing Francophone immigration outside Quebec.
Looking Ahead: Election Outcomes and Their Implications
The outcome of the 2025 federal election is set to dramatically influence Canada’s immigration landscape:
- Conservative Victory: A win for Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives would likely see a substantial reduction in immigration levels, emphasizing skilled economic migrants and fortified border security. Such a scenario could further restrict humanitarian and family streams, aligning Canada’s policies more closely with the country's current infrastructural concerns.
- Liberal Triumph: Under a Liberal majority, the focus would tilt toward moderating growth with stricter controls on temporary residents while safeguarding family reunification and economic contributions. With the current target of 395,000 permanent residents, a Liberal-led government is expected to maintain a balanced approach that echoes pre-pandemic practices.
- NDP Ascendancy: An NDP win might reverse some of the current cuts, with increased investment in immigration processing and settlement services. The party’s approach prioritizes compassionate policies and streamlined integration, potentially easing systemic bottlenecks while reinforcing Canada’s humanitarian reputation.
- Coalition or Minority Arrangement: If the election results in a minority or coalition government, blended policies are on the horizon. For example, a Liberal–NDP coalition could combine higher immigration targets with improved processing efficiency, while a Conservative-led minority might be compelled to compromise on both economic and humanitarian fronts.
As Canadians cast their votes in the coming weeks, the stakes are clear: the direction taken in this election will not only redefine Canada’s demographic future but also shape how the nation meets the twin challenges of infrastructure capacity and economic growth. With immigration at the heart of these discussions, stakeholders—from prospective immigrants to policy experts—are watching closely as Canada charts its path forward.
In a rapidly changing global landscape, the debate over immigration policy encapsulates broader questions about national identity, economic priorities, and social cohesion. As this election approaches, further analysis may explore how these policies compare internationally and what lessons Canada's experience offers to other nations facing similar challenges.
